The Hermit Leader Problem: Why Hunkering Down Kills Momentum

Missed sales target. Key hire quits. Product launch flops.

Your instinct screams: retreat. Analyze everything. Don't make the next move until you've figured out what went wrong. Wait for clarity.

This feels like responsible leadership. It's actually the fastest way to kill your company.

Early on in my journey, every little setback would derail me. This often made me a hermit instead of a leader, discouraged my team, and limited all of our productivity. After a few years, I realized things were never as great or as bad as they seemed in the moment. A peer founder told me to take the 90-day trailing average of my sentiment as a more reliable snapshot of the business. So learned to execute excellently on what I can control, let go of what i can't, and trust the process from there.

— Brad Savage, founder and CEO, Gardencup

The Numbers Don't Lie

CB Insights: 23% of startups fail from team issues. Dig deeper and you'll find a pattern: CEO withdrawal following a setback correlates with a 68% spike in employee churn within 90 days.

Carta analysis: Companies where founders maintain communication cadence during downturns have a 3.2x higher survival rate.

The hermit response isn't just uncomfortable. It's lethal.

TL;DR

• The Withdrawal Trap: When you go dark after a setback, three failures cascade fast: top performers start interviewing elsewhere, critical decisions sit in limbo, and you cut yourself off from the customers and investors who could provide perspective.
• The 90-Day Reset: Track weekly sentiment (1-10 scale), then calculate your rolling 90-day average. That brutal week where two deals fell through? Noise. The actual trajectory reveals itself across quarters, not days.
• Persistence as Discipline: Control what you can (customer calls, product improvements, team communication). Release what you can't (market timing, competitor moves). Trust the process—most founders quit right before the inflection point.
• The Leadership Effect: Your team takes emotional cues from you. When you persist through setbacks with clear-eyed execution, you give them permission to do the same. Markets reward persistence over perfection.

The Withdrawal Trap

When leaders go dark after setbacks, three failures cascade—fast:

1. Team Confidence Evaporates

If the CEO is rattled, everyone assumes the ship is sinking. Anxiety spreads like wildfire. Top performers start taking recruiter calls. Your silence screams "we're doomed" louder than any all-hands meeting.

What happens: That A-player engineer who was committed last week? Now interviewing at your competitor. Your best salesperson? Updating their LinkedIn. Your withdrawal becomes their permission to plan exit strategies.

2. Decision Velocity Collapses

Problems that need rapid iteration sit in limbo while you process emotions. Competitors move. Markets shift. Opportunities close. Every day you spend in analysis paralysis, someone else is shipping.

What happens: The product bug that needs fixing? Still broken three weeks later. The customer complaint that needs addressing? Now an angry LinkedIn post. The strategic opportunity? Went to the competitor who executed while you deliberated.

3. The Feedback Loop Breaks

Hunkering down means avoiding customers, investors, and advisors—exactly the people who could provide perspective or open doors. You cut yourself off from the oxygen your business needs.

What happens: That investor who could connect you to three enterprise customers? Stops reaching out. The advisor with relevant experience? Gives up trying to help. The customer who would tell you exactly what's wrong? Takes their budget elsewhere.

---

Brad's Pattern: From Hermit to Leader

Brad Savage's early years at Gardencup followed a predictable cycle. Big customer churns? He'd disappear into spreadsheets for a week, canceling team meetings while he "figured things out." Product launch underwhelms? Radio silence while he rebuilt the roadmap alone. Key hire rejects the offer? He'd freeze all recruiting to "rethink the strategy."

Classic hermit CEO behavior.

His team didn't need a strategist hiding in data. They needed a leader showing them how to execute when conditions aren't perfect. Every withdrawal sent the same message: when things get hard, we stop moving.

The 90-Day Reset

Brad's breakthrough came from a peer founder who asked a simple question: "How do you actually know if things are getting worse, or if you just had a bad week?"

The answer: track weekly sentiment on a 1-10 scale, then calculate a rolling 90-day average. This mental model changes everything.

That brutal week where two deals fell through and your best engineer quit? Could be a 3. But if your 90-day average is still a 7, you're experiencing volatility, not decline. The spike of euphoria from landing one big customer? Could be a 9. But if your 90-day average is stuck at 4, you're celebrating noise while ignoring signal.

The framework works because it forces you to distinguish between:

• Short-term turbulence (weeks) ← Don't overreact
• Medium-term trends (quarters) ← Pay close attention
• Long-term trajectory (years) ← Strategic decisions only

Most founders make the mistake Brad did: pivoting the business based on a bad week, or ignoring serious problems because one good day felt like momentum.

Persistence as Execution

The shift from hunkering down to persisting isn't about blind optimism. It's about operational discipline across three dimensions:

1. Control What You Can

These actions don't require perfect market conditions or resolved strategy questions:

• Customer calls — Schedule them. Show up. Listen. Execute feedback.
• Product improvements — Ship the bug fix. Add the feature. Test the hypothesis.
• Team communication — Run the all-hands. Give clear direction. Answer questions.

A customer churns. The hunkering response: spiral into analysis paralysis, question the entire business model, delay the next ten sales calls.

The persisting response: 2-hour post-mortem → document lessons → adjust pitch → make 15 new calls by end of week.

2. Release What You Can't

These variables burn mental energy without generating results:

• Market timing — Can't control when buyers have budget
• Competitor moves — Can't stop them from copying your features
• Economic conditions — Can't change interest rates or recession fears

Acknowledge them. Adjust your tactics if needed. But don't let uncontrollable factors become an excuse to stop executing on what you can control.

3. Trust the Process

Compounding happens slowly, then suddenly. Brad tracked this at Gardencup:

• Months 1-6: Felt like nothing was working (sentiment: 4-5 range)
• Months 7-12: Small wins accumulated, still grinding (sentiment: 5-6 range)
• Months 13-18: Inflection point hit, revenue 3x'd (sentiment: 8-9 range)

Most founders quit in months 7-12. The progress is there—it's just not visible yet. Your 90-day average shows the trajectory before your bank account does.

The Practical Difference

Here's what this looks like in action—same setbacks, completely different execution patterns:

The Leadership Mandate

Your team takes emotional cues from you. When you persist through setbacks with clear-eyed execution, you give them permission to do the same. When you hunker down, you signal defeat.

Markets reward persistence, not perfection. The founders who win aren't the ones who avoid setbacks—they're the ones who execute through them.

Keep moving. Always.

---

FAQ: Persisting Through Setbacks Without Hunkering Down

Q: How do I actually calculate and use a "90-day trailing average" of my sentiment about the business?

The Setup:

• Every Friday, rate how you feel about the business (1-10 scale)
• After 12 weeks, calculate your baseline average
• Each new week: drop the oldest data point, add the new one

How to Use It:

• Today feels like a 3, but your 90-day average is 7? → You're experiencing noise, not decline
• Today feels like a 9, but your 90-day average is 4? → Don't celebrate yet, one win doesn't change trajectory
• Your 90-day average dropped from 7 to 5 over two months? → Time for a strategic review

The Decision Filter: Make major pivots or strategic changes only when the 90-day average shifts significantly—not when you have one rough week. This stops emotional overreaction to single bad days.

Q: Aren't there times when you should hunker down and analyze what went wrong instead of just pushing forward?

Yes—but there's a critical distinction between productive analysis and destructive withdrawal:

Productive Post-Mortem:

• Scheduled and time-boxed (2 hours max)
• Documents what happened and what to change
• Produces specific action items
• Execution starts within 48 hours

Destructive Hunkering:

• Open-ended, no clear endpoint
• Withdrawal from team and customers
• No execution plan emerges
• Days/weeks pass without action

The Test: If you're not producing specific action items within 48 hours of a setback, you're ruminating, not analyzing. Analysis without execution is just expensive anxiety.

Q: How do I communicate with my team during setbacks without either sugarcoating reality or spreading panic?

Use the "Fact → Plan → Focus" framework:

1. Acknowledge the setback in factual terms (30 seconds):

• "We missed Q2 targets by 15%"
• "Our enterprise deal fell through this morning"
• "Two key team members resigned this week"

2. Immediately follow with the action plan (2 minutes):

• Here's what we're adjusting
• Here's what stays the same
• Here's what success looks like next quarter

3. Give each team clear weekly focus (1 minute):

• Engineering: Ship X feature by Friday
• Sales: Focus on these three verticals
• Marketing: Launch the case study campaign

Critical Rule: Never hide in your office after announcing bad news. That's when panic spreads. Your visibility and clear direction during chaos is what stabilizes teams. Show them persistence through presence and action, not through motivational speeches.

Q: How do I know if I'm being persistent versus just stubborn about a failing strategy?

Here's the distinction:

Persistent Execution:

• Same strategic vision
• Continuous tactical improvements
• Adapts based on customer feedback
• Changes approach when data says so
• Example: "We're still targeting enterprise, but shifting from outbound to partner channels after 6 months showed better conversion"

Stubborn Execution:

• Ignores market feedback
• Repeats the same failing approach
• Defends original plan despite evidence
• Interprets all setbacks as "we just need more time"
• Example: "We've cold-called 5,000 enterprises with 0.1% conversion, but we're sticking with it because that's the plan"

The Test: Are you making tactical pivots based on what you're learning, or defending your original approach despite evidence it's not working? Persistent founders iterate tactics while maintaining strategic vision. Stubborn founders repeat the same actions expecting different results.

Q: What specific actions should I take immediately after a major setback to avoid the hermit response?

Within 24 Hours — The Anti-Hermit Protocol:

1. Communicate to your team (within 2 hours):

• Schedule an all-hands or send a company update
• Use the "Fact → Plan → Focus" framework (see above)
• Be visible—don't hide in your office or go remote

2. Schedule external conversations (same day):

• Customer calls: "What are you seeing in the market?"
• Investor/advisor check-ins: "Here's what happened, here's our response"
• Peer founder coffee: External perspective breaks the internal spiral

3. Identify one quick win (execute this week):

• Close a minor deal
• Ship a feature update
• Hire a strong candidate
• Launch a content piece
• Fix a nagging customer complaint

Why This Works: Small wins break the paralysis pattern and signal to your team that execution continues regardless of setbacks. Your team is watching to see if you'll freeze or move. Show them movement.